judgment

The Modern Peril of the Availability Heuristic

The availability heuristic teaches us that easily recalled information feels more probable. But in an era of information abundance, this bias has evolved: what we don't see—when we expect to—becomes evidence of impossibility. This essay introduces 'UnAvailability Bias'—the tendency to treat absent information as proof of nonexistence, ignoring institutional, legal, or cognitive constraints that explain the absence. From conspiracy theories surrounding high-profile arrests to medical misdiagnosis of rare conditions, the pattern repeats: silence is interpreted as deception, restraint as conspiracy. When information is unlimited, its absence becomes proof.

Do Androids Dream About Biased Judges?

A potentially valuable feature of AI applied in the legal field is identifying insightful patterns of how specific courts and judges operate that elude human cognition. However, we should never forget that the relationship between humans and algorithms is always reflexive, and we can easily corrupt our quantitative-based prediction algorithms with biases.

By |2023-04-05T02:02:19+00:00April 4th, 2023|Categories: Government & Civic Behavior, Technology & Digital|Tags: , , , , , , , |

Anchors Aweigh! How Early Perceptual Information Biases Subsequent Judgments

Anchoring and adjustment, a ubiquitous heuristic process in judgment and decision making, has been vastly demonstrated in the numerical domain. With the help of four studies, we demonstrate the anchoring and adjustment bias in perceptual domains. Additionally, we outline a process of perceptual anchoring and provide a way for a potential resolution to the disagreement among different process accounts for the anchoring phenomenon.

By |2022-02-17T05:30:57+00:00March 9th, 2021|Categories: Behavioral Theory & Insights|Tags: , , , , |
Go to Top